IFI Events
  • Upcoming events
  • Previous Events
  • HOME
  • Get In Touch
  • Upcoming events
  • Previous Events
  • HOME
  • Get In Touch
THE ISSAM FARES INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS

PREVIOUS EVENTS

Book Discussion "The United Nations and the Question of Palestine"

2/23/2025

 
On February 11, IFI hosted a discussion on Ardi Imseis’s book "The United Nations and the Question of Palestine", in collaboration with the American University of Beirut’s Palestine Land Studies Center (PLSC), the Forced Displacement Program (FDP), and the Department of Political Studies and Public Administration. In the presence of the author, PLSC Director Zeina Jallad acted as discussant, while the session was moderated by IFI Director Joseph Bahout.
Imseis started by explaining how the United Nations has been the site of a paradox when it comes to Palestine, at once holding itself out as the standard-bearer of the international rule of law while at the same time being central in law’s selective application by hegemonic actors within the UN system, what he calls ‘rule by law’. In Imseis’s view, this dynamic has resulted in the emergence of a condition in the international legal order that the Palestinian people embody. He calls this condition “international legal subalternity”, the essence of which characterized by the reliance by weaker groups on the promise of international justice through the UN only to find that it is often the UN itself who undermines this promise.

Imseis’s book offers a legal history covering the key legal moments in the modern history of Palestine: the League of Nations mandate period; the UN’s 1947 partition plan; the unique institutional and normative framework governing Palestinian refugees; the UN’s treatment of the occupied Palestinian territory since 1967; and the State of Palestine’s unsuccessful 2011 application for UN membership. For lack of time, however, he was only able to cover the first two of these.

According to Imseis, the origins of Palestinian legal subalternity are to be found in the interwar period, and the internationalization of late colonial and imperial forms of government through the League of Nations mandate system. It was at this time that the international community acting through the great imperial powers carved out, through exercise of law, Palestine’s exception as a place earmarked for European settlement with its resulting dispossession of the Palestinian people set in motion.

Imseis then critically analyzed the 1947 UN Partition Plan, highlighting its fundamental flaw: the failure by the UN to take Palestinian claims seriously as a matter of international law. At bottom, the terms of the plan were violative of core principles of international law then prevailing in respect of class “A” mandated territories, key among which was the right of self-determination of the Palestinian Arab people in the whole of Palestine. By setting imposing the so-called two state solution against the will of the indigenous Palestinian Arab majority population, the UN General Assembly set in motion a series of events that eventually paved the way for the ethnic cleansing of the country in the 1948 Nakba, the negative consequences of which have been compounded ever since.

In a vibrant question and answer session, Jallad questioned whether or not legal frameworks are capable of resolving the Palestinian issue. She stated that while the UN claims to promote peace and justice, its actions have always facilitated Palestinian displacement and prioritized Jewish settlement instead. “Law is merely a tool,” Imseis replied, explaining that governments use it to shape societies but not necessarily to achieve justice. If used tactically, with strategic ends in view, he argued that law can be a useful counter-hegemonic tool in the hands of the subaltern. In this regard, Imseis discussed Chapter 5 of his book, and the successful use of the international court of justice by the State of Palestine in the Jully 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s presence in the OPT to be unlawful as an example. In addition, both Jallad and Imseis discussed the use of the International Criminal Court to seek justice and accountability for Palestinian victims, noting that although the process has been inordinately slow and western states not very supportive, the work on this front is vital going forward, as evidenced by the outstanding arrest warrants against Israeli leadership.
​
To conclude, and in answer to Jallad’s question on whether it is possible to still believe in international law, Imseis suggested that was the wrong question in so far as legal frameworks are only as good as their ability to be deployed as a tool to shape and bring about a more legitimate, right and just world order

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    July 2025
    June 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    December 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018