IFI Events
  • Upcoming events
  • Previous Events
  • HOME
  • Get In Touch
  • Upcoming events
  • Previous Events
  • HOME
  • Get In Touch
THE ISSAM FARES INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS

PREVIOUS EVENTS

Conference on “What Do We Learn from the 2019 Social Movements in Iraq, Sudan, Algeria, and Lebanon?”

12/15/2022

 
Picture
​IFI and the Economic Research Forum (ERF) organized a conference on December 15, titled “What Do We Learn from the 2019 Social Movements in Iraq, Sudan, Algeria, and Lebanon?” Its aim was to focus on the intellectual production stemming from the region's social movements as they happened, their legacy so far, and the lessons drawn to shape a more progressive social contract.
The conference started with opening remarks by ERF Managing Director Ibrahim Elbadawi, IFI Director Joseph Bahout, and Ishac Diwan, Director of Research at Finance for Development Lab and IFI Associate Fellow; followed by five sessions, whereby several problematics regarding the social movements were raised and discussed.
During Session 1: “What Happened?” experts discussed the political economy’s underpinnings of the uprisings. According to Jeffrey G. Karam, from the Lebanese American University: “The timing and makeup of Lebanon’s protests was unprecedented. I call it a revolutionary uprising constantly unfolding with ups and downs.” Panelists questioned whether or not these movements were born out of grievances and/or aspirations, and how they compare to the movements of 2011. To clarify Sudan’s stance on the matter, Hassan Alhassan, former speaker of the Sudan Democratic Alliance, noted, “the framework agreement reached in Sudan constitutes the first stage in the political settlement process,” and that “the only guarantor is the continuation of demonstrations.”
Session 2: “The Revolutionary Movement” covered the circumstances of the revolutions in the Arab countries in question, namely Iraq, Sudan, Algeria and Lebanon. Speakers commented on the value of citizen protests, stressing that revolutions in general don’t fail.
Session 3: “The Feminist’s Hirak” dealt with the active role of women as demonstrators and social activists, and how this affected the patriarchal culture and practice. Panelists stressed that women's participation in the Hirak wasn't the first instance of their political activism. They also discussed how social media played a role in giving women a voice and how this participation led them to take part and engage in the public space. On that point, Osman Mirghani, Chief Editor of Sudan’s Al Tayar Daily noted: “In the midst of social movements, the media has a cumulative role, specifically free and responsible media, to raise awareness among citizens.”
Session 4: “The Youth of the Thawra” noted that the youth were on the front lines of protests throughout Arab countries and questioned the extent to which they contribute to cultural-social change.
Finally, Session 5: “A Revolution for Nothing? How Did Things Change?” concluded that the Social Movements of 2019 died out due to Covid-19 and repression, whereas those of 2011 were extinguished by force. However, panelists noted there were still lessons that emerged from the movements and highlighted how new dynamics among the population were born after the protests, in addition to progressive and revolutionary gains made throughout.
Read more about the conference here and the complete agenda here.

Conference on Political Violence and The Impact of Archives on Memory and Justice

12/9/2022

 
On the occasion of the International Day of Commemoration and Dignity of the Victims of the Crime of Genocide and of the Prevention of this Crime, the Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs (IFI) at the American University of Beirut, in collaboration with the Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU) Lebanon and Lepsius Haus Potsdam, held a hybrid conference titled “Memory and Justice: Remembrance in the Aftermath of Political Violence.” The conference took place on December 9, 2022, with panel discussions covering the importance of archives in the analysis and interpretation of history, as well as regional experiences in the modification of history and memory and its repercussions on justice.
“This is the sixth edition of this conference series that IFI holds regularly with AGBU,” Dr. Joseph Bahout, IFI director, noted in his opening remarks. “This is the sixth conference that we hold around the same thematic of genocide, justice, memory, remembrance, reparation, and other very painful issues. It is my personal view, and one I believe AGBU’s leaders also share, that we have started to build an intellectual and conceptual coherence around a very important theme, not only politically but intellectually and conceptually on how to think about past wounds and traumas, and how to treat them politically and historically.” Bahout concluded that “without this, there can’t be a peaceful present nor a peaceful future.”
Executive Director of AGBU Lebanon Arine Ghazarian, said that “on this occasion, we honor and remember the victims of the crime of genocide while AGBU continues its 116-year history of driving thoughtful conversations and impactful programming, as the largest Armenian philanthropic organization in the world to support the global Armenian nation through cultural, educational, humanitarian, and socio-economic development initiatives.” Ghazarian added that “the Genocide Convention was adopted in December 1948 and it was the first human rights treaty adopted by the UN General Assembly. Since 2016, AGBU has been proudly standing with the United Nations to highlight the issue of genocide awareness, human rights, and refugee’s assistance.”
Director of Lepsius Haus Potsdam and keynote speaker Dr. Roy Knocke highlighted the importance of archives in the analysis and interpretation of history. Describing archives as the “crooked timber of memory,” Knocke stressed on the subjectivity of these documents and how memory could be modified and changed according to various factors. As such, Knocke claimed that there are “different perspectives of the same historical event found in an archive. History is a vast canvas of grey zones, which we should approach with objectivity.”
The conference’s panel discussions covered the process of archives collection, uses and misuses of archives and their storage, as well as how archives stand as independent and historical witness and their relation to transitional justice. The case studies of the Yazidis, Cambodia, and Lebanon were also presented. The conference ended with a fireside chat on accountability mechanisms, highlighting the new methods of archiving and documentation, including the role of social media as archiving institutions.
 
A recording of the entire conference can be watched online on IFI’s Facebook page.

Policy Roundtable: Preventing and Responding to Violent Extremism through Community Resilience

12/9/2022

 
Picture
 
IFI in collaborating with La Fondation Maison des sciences de l’Homme- Paris (FMSH) and the Berghof Foundation, hosted a policy roundtable titled “Preventing and Responding to Violent Extremism through Community Resilience (PAVE)” on December 9, 2022.  The roundtable aimed to gather representatives of the donor community working on Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism” (P/CVE) in Lebanon to share findings and discuss the evidence-based policy recommendations presented by the EU H2020 project PAVE.

The panel included Rudayna Al-Baalbaky - Arab and International Program Coordinator at IFI; Lara Azzam - Senior Project Manager and Research Fellow at the Berghof Foundation; Johanna-Maria Hülzer - Junior Project Manager at the Berghof Foundation; Marie Kortam - Senior Research Fellow at La Fondation Maison des sciences de l’homme; and moderated by Josep Garcia Coll – Researcher at the Euro-Arab Foundation for Higher Studies. Preventing violent extremism on a community level has been an under-researched topic that lacks conceptualization. To overcome this obstacle, the EU funded the three-year PAVE project, which collected data across twelve countries from the Middle East, North Africa, the Western Balkans, and Europe.
 ​“Key outputs of the project include PAVE research reports that have been published on the project website. In addition, we are currently publishing a series of policy briefs compiling key recommendations for each country. We have developed a transnational risk and resilience map on the basis of our thematic work on diaspora communities. We have a forthcoming toolkit for practitioners and policy makers. Also, we are currently developing training tools based on all research findings which can be useful for practitioners.” -Johanna-Maria Hüzler
​In addition to introducing the PAVE project, the policy roundtable presented findings on drivers of both vulnerability and resilience to violent extremism in Lebanon. The research in Lebanon investigated Sunni, Shiite, and Maronite communities based on two main thematic clusters: the interactions between states and religious institutions and online and offline (de)radicalization.
“From our side (La Fondation Maison des sciences de l’homme) we focused on the Sunni and Maronite communities. Regarding the Sunni community, we chose to focus on Saida city. The approach was territorial because of the work with the municipality. And many root causes of violent extremism in Lebanon are mainly territorial and spatial. For the Maronite community, it was an agency-network approach. In Saida city, we targeted state institutions and informal/formal religious leaders. In the Maronite community, we focused on the Free Patriotic Movement, a political party in Lebanon, and especially its deputies’ hate speech against Muslims and refugees in Lebanon. We also studied the interaction between the FPM and Maronite patriarch, bishops, Lebanese Forces political party, plus some experts.” -Marie Kortam
“One of the aspects of the power-sharing system in Lebanon is the structural intersection between the spheres of formal Sunni religion and political parties. The interaction between these official institutions can both act as a factor of community vulnerability and resilience towards the acts and discourse of violent extremism. Variables such as the political affiliation of state and religious institutions, the leadership of the dominant political party, political polarization, and regional powers’ intervention, play a role in this interaction. The effects that these variables produce are determined by the scope (community- or state-level) of the analysis.”  -Rudayna Al-Baalbaky
“In our field site of Majdal Anjar, during the period from 2000 to 2010, radicalization mainly took place offline, such as through the circulation of audio tapes and videos from abroad. Young people from Majdal Anjar would gather to watch violent videos of the war in Iraq that made them feel either collectively victorious or collectively victimized. From 2010 onwards, social media was the main medium of radicalization, particularly on Telegram. This was coupled with the feeling of disenfranchisement that is associated with being a Lebanese Sunni under the perceived Hezbollah domination. Sources of offline radicalization include books through which jihadist theorists Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi and Abu Qatada disseminated Salafi-Jihadi ideology. Those same books became some of the material used for online radicalization, uploaded on social media platforms, circulated and discussed among jihadi circles and referenced in recruitment processes,” -Lara Azzam
The discussed findings are included in PAVE Working Paper 4 and Working Paper 6. By presenting key findings on violent extremism in Lebanon, the policy roundtable aimed to provide context-adaptable policy recommendations to the donors and partners of Preventing Violent Extremism (PVE) in Lebanon.
​
The presentation was followed by a Q&A session, with representatives from the Lebanese National PVE Coordination Unit, Australian Embassy, European Union, French Embassy, Japanese Embassy, and International and Ibero-American Foundation for Administration and Public Policies.

Book Discussion: "Contested Concepts in Migration Studies"

12/7/2022

 
Picture
IFI in collaboration with the Asfari Institute for Civil Society & Citizenship at the American University of Beirut held a book discussion of "Contested Concepts in Migration Studies" with author Ricard Zapata-Barrero Professor at the Department of Political and Social Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.  The discussion was held on December 7 and moderated by Sari Hanafi.

In his opening remarks, Hanafi introduced the book as one that “provides awareness and comprehension to the complex questions of migration studies,” noting that refugees should be considered as a legal concept and not as a sociological concept. During the discussion, Zapata-Barrero emphasized that concepts related to migration and diversity are always contested. He also questioned why certain concepts are more operative in certain regions than others, and why some particular concepts are not welcomed or simply ignored in some regions, all which he hoped his book would shed greater light on.
​
Read more on the book here.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018